Imagine discovering your mind has been hijacked, every thought and sight exposed to unseen invaders. This chilling premise is at the heart of The Copenhagen Test, the new Peacock TV series starring Simu Liu and Melissa Barrera, which premiered on December 27th. But here's where it gets controversial: while the show boasts a compelling concept and a stellar cast, critics are divided on whether it delivers on its promise. Is it a fresh take on the spy genre or a missed opportunity?
The series follows a first-generation Chinese-American intelligence analyst (played by Simu Liu) who realizes his brain has been hacked, granting the perpetrators access to everything he sees and hears. It’s a premise that feels eerily relevant in today’s surveillance-saturated world. Melissa Barrera co-stars, adding to the show’s star power. But what are the critics saying so far? Let’s dive in.
The Copenhagen Test currently holds a 75% Fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes, but the reviews are a mixed bag. Looper gave it a modest 5 out of 10, labeling it “a run-of-the-mill espionage series”—a harsh verdict that suggests the show fails to stand out in a crowded genre. On the flip side, FandomWire awarded it a 7 out of 10, praising its “SpyFy-light, sleek and fun” vibe and highlighting Simu Liu’s commanding performance. They encourage viewers to “take the test, pass or fail, and enjoy the ride.”
Collider was even more enthusiastic, giving it an 8 out of 10 and applauding its blend of sci-fi elements with spy thrills, calling it “truly fresh.” Meanwhile, The AU Review scored it 3.5 out of 5, noting its focus on tension over easy thrills and its relevance in today’s media landscape. But not everyone is convinced. AV Club argues that despite its ambitious swings, the show mostly misses the mark, especially when compared to other compelling spy dramas like Slow Horses and The Agency.
Variety takes a more critical stance, acknowledging the stellar cast and solid concept but slamming the execution. They cite overlong pacing that drains the tension and excitement, leaving the show feeling flat. Yet, CBR offers a counterpoint, praising the show’s sophistication, clever red herrings, and a finale that “really sticks the landing.”
And this is the part most people miss: While some critics dismiss it as generic, others see it as a thought-provoking exploration of privacy, identity, and the blurred lines between reality and manipulation. Is The Copenhagen Test a flawed gem or a missed opportunity? That’s for you to decide. But one thing’s for sure: it’s a show that sparks debate. What’s your take? Does it deserve a spot on your watchlist, or is it a pass? Let us know in the comments!
